Walking upright
seems so obvious and natural to us humans. In fact, the ability to walk on two
legs is the trait that separated the first hominids from other four-legged apes,
making bipedality one of the most fundamental human characteristics. Since the
1960s the fossil record has significantly increased, however
scientists still cannot agree on why and how this radical change came about.
So let me start
with what we can be the most certain about: the timeline of bipedality
development. Here are some examples of the ancient roots of upright walking:
- The shape of the thigh bones of Orrorin tugenensis who lived 6 Ma suggest Orrorin was bipedal.
- The reconstruciton of the skeleton of Ardipithecus ramidus from 4.4 Ma shows extensive evidence for bipedality too.
- Lucy, the 3.2-million-year-old Australopithecus afarensis fossil, leaves no doubt for the species’ upright walking.
However, while
showing signs of bipedality, all of the above species retained some features
(such as long arms, short legs and long fingers and toes) indicating that they
spent a considerable amount of time on trees. Homo erectus, ‘the upright man’ who appeared 1.89 Ma, was the first
fully terrestrial hominid with an anatomy very similar to ours (Wayman: 2012).
What can we
conclude from the current evidence then? Firstly, it suggests that the
transition between quadrupedalism and bipedalism was gradual. Although first
signs of walking upright appeared 6-7 Ma, it wasn’t until around 3 Ma when the
early hominins became nearly as efficient at bipedal locomotion as us. They
developed foot and pelvic bones which provided more support and stability for
bipedal movement. The figure below represents the comparison of foot and pelvic
bones between chimpanzees, Australopithecus
africanus and Homo sapiens (Arsuaga and Martinez: 2006).
Source:
http://anthro.palomar.edu/hominid/australo_2.htm
The second
conclusion we can draw is that, again, the past might have been much more
complicated than we thought. We know that the hominin family tree used to be
very diverse and it’s likely there was a high degree of locomotor diversity
within early hominins too (Harcourt-Smith and Aiello: 2004).
Different patterns of locomotion represented adaptations to a variety of
habitats – which fits nicely with what I said about climate change and habitat
fragmentation in my previous posts. In the next post I will explore different
theories on the development of bipedality in hominins, as well as the possible
relationships between walking upright and the changing climate.
No comments:
Post a Comment